SAINI ELECTRICAL WORKS  Vs PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

ARB.P. 321/2020 Page 1 of 2
$~8(original side)
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Decided on 21st January, 2021
+ ARB.P. 321/2020
SAINI ELECTRICAL WORKS ….. Petitioner
Through Mr. Anil Sehrawat, Adv.

versus

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ….. Responden t
Through Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC (Civil)
with Ms. Sukriti Ghai and Mr.
Manas Bhatnagar, Advs . for
GNCTD
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C .HARI SHANKAR

O R D E R (ORAL)
% 21.01.2021
(Video -Conferencing)

C .HARI SHANKAR, J.

1. On the attention of Mr. Sehrawat, learned counsel for the
petitioner, being drawn to the fact that the protocol prescribed in
Clause 25 of the Agreement between the parties has not been strictly complied with and that, therefore, invocation of Section 1 1(6) of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 at this stage may not be
permissible, Mr. Sehrawat seeks leave to withdraw this petition, with liberty to re -approach the Court after following the protocol prescribed
in Clause 25 of the Agreement. ARB.P. 321/2020

2021:DHC:229ARB.P. 321/2020 Page 2 of 2

2. Leave and liberty is granted as prayed for.

3. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J
JANUARY 21, 2021
r.bararia

2021:DHC:229