delhihighcourt

E . HC GD RAJESH SINGH  Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

W.P.(C) 303/2021 and connected matters Page 1 of 6
$~Suppl. -37 to 40 , 42, 45, 46, 49, 51, 53, 54 & 55
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 303/2021 & CM APPL.779/2021
E . HC GD RAJESH SINGH ….. Petitioner
Through: Mr.Om Prakash Agarwal, Advocate.

versus

UNION OF I NDIA AND ORS ….. Respondents
Through: Mr.Vikram Jetly, CGSC and
Ms. Monika Arora, Advocate for
UOI.

+ W.P.(C) 305/2021 & CM APPL.783/2021
EX HC GD RATTAN LAL ….. Petitioner
Through: Mr.Om Prakash Agarwal, Advocate.

versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ….. Respondents
Through Mr.Vikram Jetly, CGSC and
Ms. Monika Arora, Advocate for UOI.

+ W.P.(C) 306/2021 & CM APPL.784/2021
EX HC GD RAJ KUMAR ….. Petitioner
Through: Mr.Om Prakash Agarwal, Advocate.

versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ….. Respondents
Through: Mr.Vikram Jetly, CGSC and
Ms. Monika Arora, Advocate for
UOI.

2021:DHC:107-DBW.P.(C) 303/2021 and connected matters Page 2 of 6

+ W.P.(C) 307/2021 & CM APPL.785/2021
EX HC GD RAMBIR SINGH ….. Petitioner
Through: Mr.Om Prakash Agarwal, Advocate.

versu s

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ….. Respondents
Through: Mr.Vikram Jetly, CGSC and
Ms. Monika Arora, Advocate for UOI.

+ W.P.(C) 317/2021 & CM APPL.804/2021
EX. H/GD ASHOK KUMAR ….. Petitioner
Through: Mr.Om Prakash Agarwal, Advocate.

versus

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ….. Respondents
Through: Mr.Vikram Jetly, CGSC and
Ms. Monika Arora, Advocate for
UOI.

+ W.P.(C) 324/2021 & CM APPL.814/2021
CT/GD KAPTAN SINGH ….. Petitioner
Through: Mr.Om Prakash Agarwal, Advocate.

versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ….. Respondents
Through: Mr.Vikram Jetly, CGSC and
Ms. Monika Arora, Advocate for UOI.

2021:DHC:107-DBW.P.(C) 303/2021 and connected matters Page 3 of 6
+ W.P.(C) 329/2021 & CM APPL.872/2021

EX HC GD RAMA NAND ….. Petitioner
Through: Mr.Om Prakash Agarwal, Advocate.

versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ….. Respondents
Through: Mr.Vikram Jetly, CGSC and Ms. Monika Arora, Advocate for UOI.

+ W.P.(C) 350/2021 & CM APPL.909/2021
EX HC GD KESHAR SINGH ….. Petitioner
Through: Mr.Om Prakash Agarwal, Advocate.

versus

UOI AND OTHERS ….. Respondents
Through: Mr.Vikram Jetly, CGSC and Ms. Monika Arora, Advocate for
UOI.

+ W.P.(C) 352/2021 & CM APPL.912/2021

EX HC GD SURESH CHAND RANA ….. Petiti oner
Through: Mr.Om Prakash Agarwal, Advocate.

versus

UOI AND OTHER ….. Respondents
Through: Mr.Vikram Jetly, CGSC and
Ms. Monika Arora, Advocate for UOI.

+ W.P.(C) 361/2021 & CM APPL.962/2021

EX HC GD JAI KISHAN SINGH RANA . …. Petitioner
Through: Mr.Om Prakash Agarwal, Advocate.
2021:DHC:107-DBW.P.(C) 303/2021 and connected matters Page 4 of 6
versus

UOI AND OTHERS ….. Respondents
Through: Mr.Vikram Jetly, CGSC and
Ms. Monika Arora, Advocate for
UOI.

+ W.P.(C) 362/2021 & CM APPL.963/2021
EX HC GD KUNWAR SINGH RANA ….. Petitioner
Through: Mr.Om Prakash Agarwal, Advocate.

versus

UOI AND OTHER ….. Respondents
Through: Ms.Monika Arora, Advocate and
Mr. Vikram Jetly, Advocate for UOI.

+ W.P.(C) 365/2021 & CM APPL.968/2021
EX HC GD RAMDHARI SINGH ….. Petitioner
Through: Mr.Om Prakash Agarwal, Advocate.

versus

UOI AND OTHERS ….. Respondents
Through: Mr.Vikram Jetly, CGSC and
Ms. Monika Arora, Advocate for UOI.

% Date of Decision: 11th January, 2021
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON

J U D G M E N T

2021:DHC:107-DBW.P.(C) 303/2021 and connected matters Page 5 of 6
MANMOHAN , J (Oral)
1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing :
2. Present batch of petitions have been filed seeking a number of
prayers. However, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that a similar
order as passed by a Division Bench in W.P.(C) No.6437/2019 dated 30th
May, 2019 be passed in the present writ petitions. He clarifies that neither
the judgment and order dated 30th
3. Issue notice. May, 2019 in W.P.(C) No.6437/2019 nor
the judgment s referred to in the said order have been challenged before the
Supreme Court by the respondents.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents accept notice. Learned counsel
for the respondents state that in similar matters, notices have been issued by the Supreme Court in the condonation of delay and special leave
petitions. They, however, candidly state that there is no stay in the said
special leave petitions.
5. It is pertinent to mention that the petitioners have preferred the
present writ petitions to primarily seek a mandamus to the respondents to grant the benefit of the second financial upgradation under the MACP
Scheme in the Pay Band of Rs.9300- 34800 with Grade Pay of Rs.4200
w.e.f. 01
st January, 2006 and wherever 20 years have been completed till
the date the petitioners’ voluntarily retired on 30th June, 2006 or the dates
mentioned in the prayer clause along with consequential benefits including arrears. The petitioners’ claim is based upon the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Union of India and Ors. Vs. Balbir Singh Turn &
Anr., Civil Appeal Diary No.3744/2016 along with other cases decided on
08
th December, 2017 . The petitioners also place reliance on the decision of
2021:DHC:107-DBW.P.(C) 303/2021 and connected matters Page 6 of 6
the Division Bench of this Court in Sunil Kumar Tyagi vs. Union of India
& Anr. , W.P. (C) No.3549/2018 decided on 01st
6. As admittedly there is no interim order passed by the Supreme Court
in any of the special leave petitions filed by the Union of India in similar
matters, we dispose of the present batch of writ petitions in similar terms as
passed in W.P.(C) No.6437/2019 i.e. a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioners’ claim in the light of the judgments in Union of
India and Ors. Vs. Balbir Singh Turn & Anr. (supra) and Sunil Kumar
Tyagi vs. Unio n of India & Anr (supra) and to dispose of the
representations of the petitioners positively within twelve weeks from
today. It is clarified that in the event the Supreme Court varies or set
asides the order passed by the Division Bench in Sunil Kumar Tya gi vs.
Union of India & Anr (supra) and/or any other similar matter, then the
present order shall abide by the order(s) of the Apex Court. May, 2019.
7. With the aforesaid direction, the present batch of writ petitions along
with pending applications stand disposed of.
8. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be
also forwarded to the learned counsel through e -mail.

MANMOHAN, J
ASHA MENON, J
JANUARY 11, 2021
KA

2021:DHC:107-DB