SANCHETI APPLIANCES PVT. LTD. vs C. LAL MARKETTING PVT. LTD. AND ANR.

$~8 & 52
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 134/2022
SANCHETI APPLICANCES PVT LTD. ….. Petitioner
Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv.

versus

C.LAL MARKETING PVT LTD. & ANR ….. Respondents
Through: Mr. Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, CGSC with Mr. Srish Kumar Mishra, Mr. Sagar Mehlawat, Mr. Alexander Mathai Paikaday, Mr. M Sriram and Mr. Krishnan V, Advs.

+ C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 361/2021
SANCHETI APPLIANCES PVT. LTD. ….. Petitioner
Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv.

versus

C. LAL MARKETTING PVT. LTD. AND ANR.
….. Respondents
Through: Mr. Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, CGSC with Mr. Srish Kumar Mishra, Mr. Sagar Mehlawat, Mr. Alexander Mathai Paikaday, Mr. M Sriram and Mr. Krishnan V, Advs.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R (O R A L)
% 11.10.2023

C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 134/2022 & C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 361/2021

1. Mr. Pankaj Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned marks of the respondents, forming subject matter of challenge in these petitions preferred under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, have been removed from the Register of Trademarks on account of their not being renewed after they had expired.

2. As such, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to institute fresh proceedings in case the marks are renewed, he seeks, for the present, to withdraw these petitions.

3. Reserving leave and liberty as aforesaid, these petitions are disposed of as withdrawn.

C.HARI SHANKAR, J
OCTOBER 11, 2023
ar

C.O(COMM.IPD-TM) 134/2022 & C.O.(COMM.IPD-TM) 361/2021 Page 1 of 5