SACHIN SHARMA vs RICHA SHARMA

$~2
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ TR.P.(C.) 49/2024 and CM APPL. 18150-51/2024
SACHIN SHARMA ….. Petitioner
Through: Mr. Shanmuga Patro, Advocate

versus

RICHA SHARMA ….. Respondent
Through: Ms. Vandana Kumar, Advocate

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R (ORAL)
% 16.04.2024

1. By this petition under Section 24 of the CPC, the petitioner seeks transfer of HMA 2094/2023 (Richa Sharma v. Sachin Sharma) presently pending with the Family Court, North Delhi, Rohini Court Complex to the Family Court, North-West Delhi, Rohini Court Complex, in view of the pendency, before the latter Court, of HMA 1051/2018 (Sachin Sharma v. Richa Sharma). The petition also seeks consolidation of the two proceedings.
2. Ms. Vandana Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent does not oppose the prayer for transfer but opposes the further prayer that the two suits be consolidated.
3. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the prayer for consolidation. Either side may, if it so chooses, move the concerned Court with the said prayer. The Court, which is so moved, would take a decision on the prayer on its own merits.
4. However, in view of the stand adopted by Ms. Vandana Kumar, learned counsel for the Respondent, HMA 2094/2023 (Richa Sharma v. Sachin Sharma) stands transferred from the Family Court, North Delhi, Rohini Court Complex to the Family Court, North-West Delhi, Rohini Court Complex.
5. This transfer petition is allowed to the aforesaid extent.

C.HARI SHANKAR, J
APRIL 16, 2024/yg
Click here to check corrigendum, if any

TR.P.(C.) 49/2024 Page 2 of 2