MIS. TATA ALDESA (JV) vs MIS. DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED (DFCCIL)

$~55
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 660/2024, I.A. 38098/2024
MIS. TATA ALDESA (JV) …..Petitioner
Through: Mr. Abhay Nath Das, Adv.

versus

MIS. DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR
CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED …..Respondent
Through: Mr. Arpan Behl and Mr. Abhishek Kumar Shrivastava, Advs.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R (ORAL)
% 02.09.2024

I.A. 38098/2024 (for exemption)

1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 660/2024

3. This is a petition under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961 for extension of the mandate of the arbitrator in seisin of the dispute between the parties.

4. It is stated that the mandated of the learned arbitrator would expire on 14 September 2024.

5. The learned Counsel for the respondent has no objection.

6. Accordingly, the mandate of the learned arbitrator stands extended by six months from 14 September 2024.

7. The petition stands allowed in the aforesaid terms.

C.HARI SHANKAR, J
SEPTEMBER 02, 2024/aky

Click here to check corrigendum, if any
1 “the 1996 Act”, hereinafter
—————

————————————————————

—————

————————————————————

OMP(MISC.)(COMM.) 660/2024 Page 2 of 2