ISHWAR BABURAO SURYAVANSHI  Vs UOI & ORS. -Judgment by Delhi High Court

$~14
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of decision: 17.01.2023
+ W.P.(C) 822/2022
ISHWAR BABURAO SURYAVANSHI ….. Petitioner
Through: None

versus

UOI & ORS. …. Respondents
Through: Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Ansari, Sr. Panel Counsel

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

J U D G M E N T (oral)
1. None has appeared on behalf of petitioner.
2. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks directions to the respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated 06.11.2020 and provide the deficient amount of Rs.1280/- per month including arrears in the compassionate allowance as per entitlement.
3. For the aforesaid relief(s), the petitioner already filed representation dated 06.11.2020 before the respondent No.2, however, the same has not been decided till date.
4. In view of above, we hereby direct the respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated 06.11.2020 filed by the petitioner within three weeks from today and communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner within one week thereafter with a reasoned order.
5. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition is disposed of.
6. Needless to say, if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decision of the respondents on his representation, he may approach the appropriate forum.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)
JUDGE

(NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA)
JUDGE
JANUARY 17, 2023/rk

Neutral Citation Number: 2023/DHC/000379

W.P.(C) 822/2022 Page 1 of 2