DAYANAND PAL vs MR. DHARMENDER KUMAR BHATI & ORS.

$~22
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 69/2024, I.A. 35081/2024
DAYANAND PAL …..Petitioner
Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav and Ms. Ishita Yadav, Advs.

versus

MR. DHARMENDER KUMAR BHATI
& ORS. …..Respondents
Through: Mr. Abhishek Kumar and Mr. Satendra Singh, Advs.

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R (ORAL)
% 05.09.2024

I.A. 35081/2024 (Exemption)

1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 69/2024

3. The learned arbitrator, who had been appointed by order dated 29 November 2019 of this Court has recused from the proceedings thereby necessitating the appointment of a substitute arbitrator in terms of Section 14(1)(a) read with Section 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961.

4. The learned Counsel for the respondents does not have any objection.

5. Accordingly, this Court appoints Mr. Piyush Gaur, Advocate (Tel: 9971897555) as the substitute arbitrator in place of the arbitrator, who has recused.

6. The substitute arbitrator would proceed from the stage at which the proceedings were at the time of recusal of the earlier arbitrator.

7. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

C.HARI SHANKAR, J
SEPTEMBER 05, 2024/aky

Click here to check corrigendum, if any
1 “the 1996 Act”, hereinafter
—————

————————————————————

—————

————————————————————

O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 69/2024 Page 1 of 2