CITIZENS WHISTLE BLOWER FORUM vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

% Reserved on: October 4, 2023
Pronounced on: February 02, 2024

+ W.P.(C) 9887/2019 & CM APPL. 40877/2019; CM APPL. 40878/2019; CM APPL. 44283/2019; CM APPL. 44284/2019 & CM APPL. 396/2022

CITIZENS WHISTLE BLOWER FORUM …… Petitioner
Through: Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Ms. Neha Rathi and Mr. Kamal Kishore Tyagi, Advocates
Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. …..Respondents
Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for respondents No.1, 2 & 6
Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Advocate for respondent No.3
Mr. Ramesh Babu, Ms. Manisha
Singh, Ms. Tanya Choudhary &
Ms. Jagriti Bharti, Advocates for respondent No.4
Ms. Pinky Anand, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Ms.Saudamini, Mr. Nishchay Kapoor & Mr. Satyajit Yadav, Advocates for respondent No.7
Ms. Pallavi Kumar & Mr. Pranav
Tanwar, Advocates for respondent No.9

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

JUDGMENT

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
1. The petitioner-organisation, claims to be a registered organization, working to provide a platform to whistleblowers across the country and to take up litigation on their behalf in order to provide them anonymity and to instill in them the necessary confidence to make disclosures without fear, arrange for their objective and impartial investigation and help to take such cases to their logical conclusions in a time bound manner.
2. The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction for an in-depth, thorough and time bound investigation by a SIT into various serious illegalities, violations and siphoning of funds committed by the promoters of Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited (IBHFL), its subsidiaries and their promoters. The petitioner has further sought directions to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Registrar of Companies (ROC), Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO), National Housing Bank (NHB), Reserve Bank of India (RBI), Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to take action against IBHFL and its promoters/owners, who through its promoters, subsidiary companies and various group of companies, has been advancing dubious loans to companies owned by large corporate groups which in turn have been routing the money back to the accounts of companies owned by the promoters of Indiabulls, so as to increase their personal wealth.
3. The petitioner alleged that the aforesaid activities of respondent No.7-India Bulls Housing Finance Ltd. and its promoters are in violation of various Statutes and Polices relating to Companies Act, 2013, Rules and Regulations of Reserve Bank of India (RBI), SEBI, National Housing Bank and other laws.
4. The petitioner further alleged that the respondent No.7 and the companies owned by its promoters have been involved in round tripping of funds in violation of the relevant laws and policy guidelines and they have also not disclosed sources thereof and their books of account also do not show the true state of affairs. However, the authorities concerned have failed to do any investigation into these allegations/reports and take required action against them, which poses serious risk and threat to the public interest.
5. The petitioner has also alleged that the respondent – IBHFL group, and the group of companies owned by it i.e. India Bulls Real Estate, Indiabulls Commercial Credit, Indiabulls Ventures, Indiabulls Infra &Power and scores of other privately held companies, with their ownership divided between the partners, has a net worth of over Rs.75,838/- crores, as per its website.
6. According to the petitioner, the IBHFL group of companies has 220 branches in 100 cities across India, which is regulated by the National Housing Bank (NHB). IBHFL contributes 80% of the Indiabulls group’s turnover and in the fiscal year 2017-18, it had disbursed loans totaling to a sum of Rs.1,22,578/-.
7. The petitioner has further alleged that IBHFL has extended huge loans to various companies and these companies in turn are routing a substantial part of the money back as investment in equities to companies apparently belonging to the key-shareholders/promoters of IBHFL including Sameer Gehlaut, the founder and Chairman of IBHFL and his family members and thereby, the borrowing companies bestow huge benefits to the key shareholders and Chairman of IBHFL for the favour they get in the form of loans from IBHFL.
8. The petitioner also alleged that a substantial part of the money loaned by IBHFL to various companies has been invested/ploughed back into companies owned by promoters/owners of Indiabulls, either directly or indirectly through subsidiaries. The intent of all these methods is to create private wealth out of public money. The manner in which Indiabull group of companies is manipulating the funds, has been narrated by the petitioner, which is as under:
a. By investing in Preference Shares of IB group subsidiaries.
b. By investing Compulsory Convertible Debentures. These debentures have been issued to the investing companies at a rate of interest of 0.01%.
c. By receipt of Mobilization Advance paid to a contractor for mobilization of resources for a project.

9. The petitioner alleged that even though few of the companies belonging to IBHFL did not have any fixed assets or not even involved in any business activity still they have extended small paid-up capital loans. Even the Directors and their office addresses are also common.
10. Petitioner has averred that the Companies Act, 2013 defines ‘charge’ as an interest or lien, created on the property or assets of a company or any of its undertakings or both as security and includes a mortgage. It is the duty of every company to register with the Registrar of Companies the specific ‘charge’ created by the company on its assets in public domain details of those who contemplate to give credit to a company to know how the property of the company is encumbered.
11. Reliance is placed upon Section 77 of the Companies Act, 2013 to submit that borrowing companies are required to file ‘Charge’ document with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs showing the amount borrowed and the security given to the lender company, within 30 days of its transaction. The said Section reads as under:
“77. Duty to register charges, etc.-
(1) It shall be the duty of every company creating a charge within or outside India, on its property or assets or any of its undertakings, whether tangible or otherwise, and situated in or outside India, to register the particulars of the charge signed by the company and the charge-holder together with the instruments, if any, creating such charge in such form, on payment of such fees and in such manner as may be prescribed, with the Registrar within thirty days of its creation:
Provided that the Registrar may, on an application by the company, allow such registration to be made
(a) in case of charges created before the commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019, within a period of three hundred days of such creation; or
(b) in case of charges created on or after the commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019, within a period of sixty days of such creation,on payment of such additional fees as may be prescribed:
Provided further that if the registration is not made within the period specified–
(a) in clause (a) to the first proviso, the registration of the charges shall be made within six months from the date of commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019, on payment of such additional fees as may be prescribed and different fees may be prescribed for different classes of companies;
(b) in clause (b) to the first proviso, the Registrar may, on an application, allow such registration to be made within a further period of sixty days after payment of such ad valorem fees as may be prescribed.]
Provided also that any subsequent registration of a charge shall not prejudice any right acquired in respect of any property before the charge is actually registered:
[Provided also that this section shall not apply to such charges as may be prescribed in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India.]
(2) Where a charge is registered with the Registrar under sub-section (1), he shall issue a certificate of registration of such charge in such form and in such manner as may be prescribed to the company and, as the case may be, to the person in whose favour the charge is created.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, no charge created by a company shall be taken into account by the liquidator [appointed under this Act or the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (31 of 2016), as the case may be,] or any other creditor unless it is duly registered under sub-section (1) and a certificate of registration of such charge is given by the Registrar under sub-section (2).
(4) Nothing in sub-section (3) shall prejudice any contract or obligation for the repayment of the money secured by a charge.”

12. The petitioner has alleged that IBHFL has extended huge sums of loans to various group of companies owned by Indiabulls, promoted by Mr. Sameer Gehlaut, which include Americorp Group, Reliance ADAG, Chordia Group, Vatika Group and DLF Group, apart from Indiabulls’ promoter group companies.
I. Americorp Group:
The details of loans advanced by IBHFL to Americorp Group is as under:-
Sr. No.
Name of the Company
Amount loaned (Rs. in crore)
1.
Transpacific Business Services Pvt. Ltd.
A copy of Balance Sheet of the Transpacific Business Services Pvt. Ltd. for the FY 2016-17 is annexed herewith as Annexure P6.
30.50
2.
Americorp Business Services Pvt. Ltd.
A copy of Balance Sheet of the Americorp Business Services Pvt. Ltd. for the FY 2015-16 is annexed herewith as Annexure P7.
32.40
3.
Chennai Business Park Pvt. Ltd.
A copy of Balance Sheet of the Chennai Business Park Pvt. Ltd. for the FY 2017-18 is annexed as Annexure P8.
50.00
4.
Americorp Capital Pvt. Ltd.
A copy of Balance Sheet of the Americorp Capital Pvt. Ltd. for the FY 2015-16 is annexed as Annexure P9.
39.00
Total
151.90

The petitioner also gave the details how the money note herein above has been funded back to Indiabulls:-

Sr. No.
Name of the Investee Company
Name of the Investor Company
Invested Amount (Rs. in crore)
1.
Indiabulls Ventures Limited
A copy of Annual Report of the Indiabulls Ventures Limited for the FY 2017-18 is annexed as (Annexure PIO
Jasol Investment &Trading
Co. Pvt. Ltd.
A copy of Financial
Statement of Jasol Investment
&Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. for
the FY 2016-17 are annexed as Annexure P11.
Joindre Finance Pvt. Ltd.
A copy of Financial Statement of the Joindre Finance Pvt. Ltd. for the FY 2017-18 are annexed Annexure) P12
19.73

19.85
2.
Indiabulls Housing Finance Co.Ltd.
A copy of Balance Sheet of the Indiabulls Housing Finance Co. Ltd. for the FY 2017-18 is annexed as Annexure P13.
Jasol Investment & Trading
Co. Pvt. Ltd.
(see Annexure P11)
22.88
3.
Myrina Builders Pvt. Ltd.
A copy of Balance Sheet of the
A copy of balance sheet of Myrina Builders Pvt. Ltd. for the FY 2017-18 is annexed as Annexure P14.
Jasol Investment & Trading
Co. Pvt. Ltd.
(See Annexure P11)
31.00
4.
Iphito Real Estate Pvt. Ltd.
A copy of relevant pages of Annual Report of the Iphito Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. for the FY 2016-17 is annexed as
Annexure P15.
Joindre Finance Pvt. Ltd.
(See Annexure P12)
44.00
5.
Indiabulls Real Estate Co. Ltd.
A Copy of Standalone Financial Statement of the Indiabulls Real Estate Co. Ltd. for the FY 2017-18 is annexed as Annexure P16.
Jasol Investment & Trading
Co. Pvt. Ltd.
(See Annexure P11)

Joindre Finance Pvt. Ltd.
(See Annexure P12)
62.28

55.13

Total

254.87

II. Reliance ADAG-
The details of the loans granted by the IBHFL to Reliance ADAG companies are as under:-

Sr. No.
Name of the Company
Loaned Amount (Rs. in crore)
1.
Reliance Inceptum Pvt. Ltd.
A Copy of Financial Statement of Reliance Inceptum Pvt. Ltd. for the FY 2017-18 is annexed as Annexure P17.
106
2.
Zapak Digital Entertainment Limited
A Copy of Financial Statement of Zapak Digital Entertainment Limited for the FY 2017-18 is annexed as Annexure P18
156
3.
Reliance Big Entertainment Pvt. Ltd
A Copy of Financial Statement of Reliance Big Entertainment Pvt. Ltd for the FY 2016-17 is annexed as Annexure P19
210
4.
Reliance Communications Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.
200
5.
Reliance Interactive Advisors Pvt. Ltd.
A copy of details of charges registered with ROC of Reliance Interactive Advisors Pvt. Ltd. for the FY 2017-18
is annexed as Annexure P20
908

Total
1580

According to petitioner, how amount of Rs.570 crores out of the afore-noted funds has been invested back to the Indiabulls of companies, is as under:-
Sr. No.
Name of the Borrower
Name of the Lender
Loaned Amount (Rs. in crore)
1.
Iphito Properties Pvt. Ltd. (a subsidiary of Indiabulls Pvt. Ltd)
A copy of Index of Charge of Iphito Properties Pvt. Ltd. is
annexed as Annexure P21.
Reliance Capital Limited
10
2.
Iphito Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. (a subsidiary of Indiabulls Pvt. Ltd)
A copy of index of charges of Iphito Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. annexed as Annexure P22.
Reliance Capital Limited
20
3.
Myrina Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. (a subsidiary of Indiabulls Pvt. Ltd)
A copy of Index of Charges with ROC of Myrina Real Estate is annexed as Annexure P23.
Reliance Capital Limited
10
4.
Myrina Builders Pvt.
Ltd. (a subsidiary of
Indiabulls Pvt. Ltd)
Reliance Capital Limited
10
5.
Orthia Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. (a subsidiary of Indiabulls Pvt. Ltd)
A copy of Index of Charges showing Orthia Real Estate Pvt.
Ltd. is annexed as Annexure P24.
Reliance Capital Limited
35
6.
EMU Constructions Pvt. Ltd. (a subsidiary of Indiabulls Pvt. Ltd)
A copy of index of charges of EMU Constructions is annexed as Annexure P25.
Reliance Capital Limited
50
7.
Galax Minerals Pvt. Ltd. (a subsidiary of Indiabulls Pvt. Ltd)
A copy of index of charges Galax
Minerals Pvt. Ltd. is annexed as
Annexure P26.
Reliance Corporate Advisory Pvt. Ltd.
50
8.
Meru Minerals Pvt. Ltd. (a subsidiary of Indiabulls Pvt. Ltd)
A copy of index of charges of Meru Minerals Pvt. Ltd. is annexed as Annexure P27
Reliance Corporate Advisory Pvt. Ltd.
185
9.
Paidia Conconnection Pvt. Ltd. (a subsidiary of Indiabulls Pvt. Ltd)
A copy of index of charges of Paidia Conconnection Pvt. Ltd. is annexed as Annexure P28.
Reliance Corporate Advisory Pvt. Ltd.
200
Total
570

III. Chordia Group Companies-
According to petitioner, the details of loans given by IBHFL to Chordia Group of Companies, is as under:-
Sr. No.
Name of the Company
Year
Loaned Amount (Rs. in crore)
Current Status
1.
AC Realty Spaces LLP
2017-18
19.50
A copy of balance sheet FY 2017-18 of AC Realty Spaces is annexed
herewith as Annexure is annexed herewith as Annexure P33.
2.
Built To Live Realty LLP
2017-18
450
This loan was repaid with money
Mahalunge Land Developers
borrowed from IBHFL.
A copy of Balance Sheet of Built To Live Realty FY 2017-18 is annexed herewith as Annexure P34.
3.
Mahalunge Land
Developers LLP
2017-18
740
A copy of Balance Sheet of Mahalunge Land Developers FY
2017-18 is annexed herewith as Annexure P35.
Total
1209.550

IV. Vatika Group Companies:
Petitioner averred that Vatika Group of Companies has as many as 51 companies with paid-up capital of Rs.1 lakh only whereas IBHFL has granted huge loan of Rs.4,600/- crores to these companies in a dubious manner. Petitioner has alleged that out of 51 such companies, 40 companies have paid-up capital of Rs.1 lakhs who have been granted loans ranging from 16 crores in case of Garin Developers Pvt. Ltd. to Rs.184.50/- crores in the case of Timor Developers. The details of IBHFL loan to Vatika Group Companies are as under:-
Sr. No.
Name of the Company
Paid-up Capital (Rs. in crore)
Loaned Amount (Rs. in crore)
1.
Garin Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
16
2.
Felisa Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
22
3.
Valda Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
23
4.
Valonia Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
27
5.
Fonzell Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
28
6.
Uland Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
25
7.
Misaki Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
41.50
8.
Zina Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
43.30
9.
Myrica Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
46
10.
Carney Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
48
11.
Agnes Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
31
12.
Cebu Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
41
13.
Acklin Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
21.50
14.
Capparis Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
19
15.
Jurgen Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
39
16.
Islay Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
26
17.
Lestin Developers Ltd.
0.01
24
18.
Hadar Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
42
19.
Bellium Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
46
20.
Bacon Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
34
21.
Edrea Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
30
22.
Hagrid Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
29
23.
Sirius Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
41
24.
Kelsey Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
29
25.
Polillo Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
19
26.
Perseus Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
46
27.
Persea Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
46.50
28.
Quon Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
41.50
29.
Pemba Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
85.50
30.
Obira Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
45
31.
Nias Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
41
32.
Ambrym Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
31.50
33.
Derica Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
42
34.
Enlai Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
45
35.
Yapen Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
35
36.
Galicia Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
30
37.
Gabby Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
32.50
38.
Bioko Developers Pvt. Ltd.
20.00
29
39.
Haben Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
148
40.
Haldis Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
159
41.
Aplin Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
104
42.
Timor Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
184.50
43.
Shivsagar Builders Pvt. Ltd.
0.25
1575 (Net amount after discount)
44.
Salton Developers Pvt. Ltd.
5.00
175.50
45.
Ignacio Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
178.50
46.
Velte Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.01
28
47.
Kepa Developers Pvt. Ltd.
1.01
185
48.
Aspire Promoters Pvt. Ltd.
0.02
100
49.
Fermina Developers Pvt. Ltd.

148.91
50.
Sh Tech Park Developers Pvt. Ltd.
0.13
222.50
(Rs.32 crore received from Indiabulls Infrastructure)
51.
Sahar Land & Housing Pvt. Ltd.

50.30
Total
4601.01

With regard to the Vatika Group Companies, the petitioner further averred that 40 of its companies were operating from Flat No.621-A, 6th Floor, Devika Towers 6, Nehru Place, New Delhi, which shows that IBHFL did not doubt diligence while granting huge loans to these promoters. The petitioner has alleged that none of these companies filed ‘Charges’ with the MCA and for many of these companies, ownership was transferred after availing the loans, even to some employees. Thereby attempts have been made to omit the name of IBHFL in the balance-sheets.
Petitioner also stated that one of the Vatika Group Companies, namely, Agnes Developers has invested back in Karkinos Constructions which is 100 percent owned by Sameer Gehlaut. Petitioner has alleged that Karnikos Constructions received Rs.200/- crores from Agnes Developers owned by Vatika Group Companies in the form of debentures and has also received a substantial amount in the form of loan from IBHFL but this company has filed no ‘Charge’ with the MCA.
Petitioner also pointed out that Karnikos Constructions has no significant asset and as per balance-sheets pertaining to the year 2017-18, has recorded Rs.724 crores in security deposit under the head ‘Long Term Loan’ which is a clear deviation from the standard accounting procedure. Petitioner averred that security deposit is purely an accommodation entry to avoid disclosure of terms of loan and identical interest.
V. DLF Group Companies:
Petitioner alleged that IBHFL has given loan of more than Rs.1705.54 crores in 48 companies owned by DLF Group Companies which is promoted by K.P.Singh. Petitioner also alleged that most of these companies have negative worth and have not filed any charge with the MCA. Petitioner further alleged that IBHFL, despite a negative worth, gave a loan of Rs.173.40 crores to Atherol Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd., which is a subsidiary of Felicite Builder & Constructions holding 30 subsidiary group of companies under it.
During the course of hearing, the attention of this Court was drawn to Annexure P-53 wherein details of IBHFL directing the loan to different DLF Companies has been mentioned as under:-
Sr. No.
Particulars
Sanctioned Amount (Rs. in crore)
Loan Amount as on 31st March, 2018 (Rs. in crore)
Remarks
1.
Kokolath Builders &
Developers Pvt. Ltd.
111
60.82
* 100% subsidiary of Atherol Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd.
* Loaned money used to purchase land and advance loan to related party.
* A part of the land is acquired again by the government at a much higher value. (Charges filed on June 11, 2019 after PIL was filed in the SC)
2.
Cadence Builders &
Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
143
84.64
* 100% Subsidiary of Atherol Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd.
* Loaned money used to purchase land and advance loan to related party.
* A part of the land is acquired again by the government at a higher compensation. (Charges filed on June 11, 2019 after PIL was filed in the SC.)
3.
Alana Builders &
Developers Pvt. Ltd.
83
44.30
* 100% subsidiary of Atherol Builders & Developers.
* Loaned money used to purchase land and advance loan to related party. (Charges filed on June 11, 2019 after the PIL was filed in the SC)
4.
Cadence Real
Estates Pvt. Ltd,
74
34.95
* 100% subsidiary of Atherol Builders & Developers.
* Loaned money used to purchase land and advance loan to related party. (Charges filed on June 11, 2019, after the PIL was filed in the SC.)
5.
Camden Builders &
Developers Pvt. Ltd.
15
10.00
* 100% subsidiary of Atherol Builders & Developers.
* Loaned money used to purchase land and advance loan to related party. Further, the land purchased by the company out of the loaned money has been mortgaged to create security interest in favour of Standard Chartered Bank for Rs. 400 crore loan availed by DLF Utilities Ltd. (Charges not filed;
6.
Jayanti Real Estate
Developers Pvt. Ltd.
39
24.82
* 100% subsidiary of Atherol Builders & Developers.
* Loaned money used to purchase land and advance loan to related party. (Charges filed on June 11, 2019, after PIL was filed in the SC.)
7.
Nadish Real Estate
Pvt. Ltd.
76
48.37
* 100% subsidiary of Atherol Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd.
* Loaned money used to purchase land and advance loan to related party. (Charges filed on June 11, 2019, after PIL was filed in the SC.)
8.
Rosalind Builds &
Constructions Pvt.
Ltd.
42
26.73
* 100% subsidiary of Atherol Builders & Developers.
* Loaned money used to purchase land and advance loan to related party.
9.
Tane Estates Pvt.
Ltd.
29
12.43
* 100% Subsidiary of Atherol Builders & Developers.
* Loaned money used to purchase land and advance loan to related party.
10.
Unicorn Real Estate
Developers Pvt. Ltd.
69
40.52
* 100% subsidiary of Atherol Builders & Developers.
* Loaned money used to purchase land and advance loan to related party. (Charges filed on June 11, 2019, after PIL was filed with the SC.
11.
Garv Promoters Pvt.
Ltd.
24
16
* 100% subsidiary of Atherol Builders & Developers.
* Loaned money used to purchase land and advance loan to related party. (Charges filed on June 11, 2019, after the PIL was filed in the SC.)
12.
Aaralyn Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd.
47
29.91
* 100% subsidiary of Atherol Builders & Developers.
* Loaned money used to purchase land and advance loan to related party. (Charges filed on June 6, 2019.)
13.
Garv Developers Pvt.
Ltd.
17
1.89
* 100% subsidiary of Ananti Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party.
14.
Naja Builders &
Developers Pvt. Ltd.
111
49.32
* 100% subsidiary of Ananti Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party.
* The company has invested Rs.22 crore in EMU Realcon, a company owned by Sameer Gehlaut. (Charges filed on June 11, 2019 after the PIL was filed in the SC, charges satisfied on June, 24.
15.
Mohak Real Estate Pvt. Ltd.
66
42.84
* 100% subsidiary of Ananti Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party.
* Compensation received from LAC, Haryana. (Charges filed on June 11,2019, after the PIL was filed in the SC, charges satisfied on June 24.)
16.
Blanca Builders &
Developers Pvt. Ltd.
77
27.38
* 100% subsidiary of Ananti Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party.
* Compensation received from LAC, Haryana. (Charges filed June 11, after the PIL was filed in the SC, 2019, charges satisfied on June 24.)
17.
Adsila Builders &
Developers Pvt. Ltd.
50
5.56
* 100% subsidiary of Ananti Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from Group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party.
* Compensation received from LAC, Haryana. (Charges filed on June 11, 2019, after the PIL was filed in the SC, charges satisfied on June 24.)
18.
Zanobi Builders &
Constructions Pvt.
Ltd.
60
21.71
* 100% subsidiary of Ananti Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party.
* Compensation received from LAC, Haryana. (Charges filed on June11,2019 after the PIL was filed in the SC, charges satisfied on June 24.)
19.
Damalis Builders &
Developers Pvt. Ltd.
110
58.07
* 100% subsidiary of Ananti Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party.
* Compensation received from LAC, Haryana. (Charges filed on June 11, 2019 after the PIL was filed in the SC; charges satisfied on June 24.)
20.
Luvkush Builders Pvt.
Ltd.
36
19.06
* 100% subsidiary of Ananti Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party.
* Compensation received from LAC, Haryana. (Charges filed on June 11, 2019 after the PIL was filed in the SC; charges satisfied on June 24.)
21.
Talvi Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd.
100
59.23
* 100% subsidiary of Ananti Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party.
* Compensation received from LAC, Haryana. (Charges filed on June 11, 2019 after the PIL was filed in the SC; charges satisfied on June 24.)
22.
Abheek Real Estate
Pvt. Ltd.
83
22.91
* 100% subsidiary of Ananti Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party.
* Compensation received from LAC, Haryana. (Charges filed on June 11, 2019 after the PIL was filed in the SC; charges satisfied on June 24.)
23.
Musetta Builders &
Developers Pvt. Ltd.
27
18
* 100% subsidiary of Felicite Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party.
* Compensation received from LAC, Haryana. (Charges filed on June 13, 2019 after the PIL was filed in the SC; charges satisfied on June 24.)
24.
Karida Real Estates
Pvt. Ltd.
83
53.28
* 100% subsidiary of Felicite Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party.
* Compensation received from LAC, Haryana. (Charges filed on June 11, 2019 after the PIL was filed in the SC; charges satisfied on June 24.)
25.
Vamil Builders &
Developers Pvt. Ltd.
20
13.33
* 100% subsidiary of Felicite Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party.
* Compensation received from LAC, Haryana. (Charges filed on June 11, 2019 after the PIL was filed in the SC; charges satisfied on June 24.)
26.
Nayef Estates Pvt.
Ltd.
36
24.00
* 100% subsidiary of Felicite Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party. (Charges filed on June 13, 2019 after the PIL was filed in the SC; charges satisfied on June 27.)
27.
Pegeen Builders &
Developers Pvt. Ltd.
14
11.67
* 100% subsidiary of Felicite Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party. (Charges filed or June 11, 2019 after the PIL was filed in the SC)
28.
Shikhi Estates Pvt.
Ltd.
20
16.67
* 100% subsidiary of Felicite Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party.
* Compensation received from LAC, Haryana. (Charges filed on June 13, 2019 after the PIL was filed in the SC; charges satisfied on June 24.)
29.
Rajika Estate
Developers Pvt. Ltd.
31
20.67
* 100% subsidiary of Felicite Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party.
* Compensation received from LAC, Haryana. (Charges filed on June 11, 2019 after the PIL was filed in the SC; charges satisfied on June 27.)
30.
Karena Estates
Developers Pvt. Ltd.
19
15.83
* 100% subsidiary of Felicite Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party. (Charges filed on June 13, 2019 after the PIL was filed in the SC; charges satisfied on June 24)
31.
Afaaf Builders &
Developers Pvt. Ltd.
30
12.86
* 100% subsidiary of Felicite Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party. (Charges filed on June 8, 2019, after the PIL was filed in the SC; charges satisfied on June 24.)
32.
Ati Sunder Estates
Developers Pvt. Ltd.
32
13.71
* 100% subsidiary of Felicite Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party.
33.
Alfonso Builders &
Developers Pvt. Ltd.
40
17.14
* 100% subsidiary of Felicite Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party. (Charges filed on June 11, 2019 after the PIL was filed in the SC; charges satisfied on June 24.)
34.
First India Estates &
Services Pvt. Ltd.
37
15.86
* 100% subsidiary of Felicite Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party.
35.
Sagardutt Builders &
Developers Pvt. Ltd.
35
15.00
* 100% subsidiary of Felicite Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party. (Charges filed on June 11, 2019 after the PIL was filed in the SC; charges satisfied on June 24)
36.
Ethan Estates
Developers Pvt. Ltd.
30
0.11
* 100% subsidiary of Felicite Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to, purchase land and advance loan to related party.
37.
Akina Builders. &
Developers Pvt. Ltd.
35
22.27
* 100% subsidiary of Felicite Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party. (Charges filed on June 11, 2019 after the PIL was filed in The SC, charges satisfied on June 24.)
38.
Laxmibanta Estates
Developers Pvt. Ltd.
37
30.83
* 100% subsidiary of Felicite Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party. (Charges filed on June 13, 2019 after the PIL was filed in the SC; charges satisfied on June 24)
39.
Arlie Builders
&Developers Pvt.
Ltd.
90
52.08
* 100% subsidiary of Felicite Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party. (Charges filed on June 13, 2019 after the PIL was filed in the SC; charges satisfied on June 24)
40.
Fabrizio Real Estates
Pvt. Ltd.
29
24.17
* 100% subsidiary of Felicite Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party. (Charges filed on June 13, 2019 after the PIL was filed in the SC, charges satisfied on June 24)
41.
Ophira Builders &
Developers Pvt. Ltd.
45
28.64
* 100% subsidiary of Felicite Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party. (Charges filed on June 6, 2019 after the PIL was filed in the SC, charge: satisfied on June 27)
42.
Caprice Builders &
Constructions Pvt.
Ltd.
24
15.28
* 100% subsidiary of Felicite Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party.
43.
Rinji Estates
DevelopersPvt. Ltd.
37
30.83
* 100% subsidiary of Felicite Builders & Construction.
* Loan money received from group companies used to purchase land and advance loan to related party. (Charges filed on June 13, 2019 after the PIL was filed in the SC; charges satisfied on June 24.)
44.
Atherol Builders &
Developers Pvt. Ltd.

173.40
* Owned by Felicite Builder & Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
* Holding company for 30 companies which have taken loans from IBHL. The loan taken by the subsidiary company is infused in the company in the form of unsecured, loan/current liability.
* The money is used to purchase land. A part of the land is acquired again by the government back at a much higher value.
45.
DLF Home
Developers Ltd.
500
338.45
* Owned by DLF Ltd.
* Rs. 1000 crore Exposure to Franklin Mutual Fund in NCDs.
* Loan money used for onward investment.

13. Petitioner also gave details of DLF Group of Companies who had transferred a substantial part of loaned amount money from IBHFL to EMU Realcon, which is owned by Sameer Gehlaut being 100 percent owner of Mughwort Real Estate. Besides, EMU Realcon has also three other companies. Petitioner gave the details of receipt of infusion of Rs.66 crore in the form of preference shares by the EMU Realcon which are as under:-
Sr. No.
Name of the Company
Amount Received (Rs. in crore)
1.
Cotys Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. (DLF Group Company)
22.00
2.
Malayeka Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. (DLF Group Company)
22.00
3.
Naja Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd (DLF Group
Company).
A copy of relevant pages of Annual Return of Naja Builders & Developers for FY 2017-18 is annexed herewith as Annexure P58.
The amount given in 2014-15 and is still outstanding.
A copy of relevant of pages of Balance Sheet for FY 2014-15 of Naja Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Is annexed herewith as Annexure P59.
22.00

Total
66.00

Petitioner has alleged that companies owned by DLF Group Company have received huge loans from IBHFL.
14. During the course of hearing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner alleged that various irregularities have been committed by the companies promoted by the Indiabulls Group, primarily ploughing away public money into private equity by issuing compulsory convertible debentures and even though these instruments are not generally redeemable, however, the Indiabulls Group of Companies has promoted redemption thereon. It has been alleged that the amount worth thousands of crores is involved in the malpractices adopted by these companies.
15. Learned counsel relied upon afore-noted table to show that company has received Rs. 726.50 crore, from Reliance Corporate, Myrina Real Estate and Iphito Real Estate (Rs. 50 crore, Rs. 589 crore and Rs. 87.5 crore, respectively). According to petitioner, the loan from Reliance Corporate Advisory, is in the form of debentures carrying 0.01% interest per annum. The loan is secured by hypothecation of current assets. However, Galax Minerals’ books of accounts show there are no current assets or insignificant current assets available except for investment which is not charged. Thus, the security is an eye wash leading one to conclude that the transaction is round tripping and accommodation entry.
16. The petitioner has alleged that some other companies where malpractices are apparent are:-
Myrina Real Estate:- The fund invested by Myrina Real Estate is from the following sources:
Sr.No.
Name of the Company
Instrument/Mode
Investments (Rs. in crore) (31 Mar 2018)
Remarks
1.
Karkinos Construction Pvt. Ltd.
0.01 % Debentures
847.13

2.
Source unknown
Mobilization advance
114.25
Facts
concealed as
there is no
business
activity in the
company, the
receipt of the
mobilization
advance is an accommodation
on entry to
avoid
incidence of
interest.
3.
EMU Construction Pvt. Ltd.
0.01% Debentures
56.39

Total
1017.77

The petitioner has alleged that a huge sum of Rs.1,142/- crore was used out of capital resources raised by shares of IBHFL and Indiabulls Real Estate and make investments in other subsidiary companies through Myrina Real Estate, even though this company has no work history of the past and the transactions were sham and were made with the mala fide intent to fight levy of interest or to fight disclosure of name in the financial statement.
Besides, the petitioner has also alleged that Myrina Real Estate is owned subsidiary of EMU Construction, which is owned by Sameer Gehlaut through Mugwort Real Estate Limited.
To demonstrate the chain of group of companies owned by Indiabulls, the petitioner has shown it through the following flow chart:-

Myrina Builders:- The company is a fully owned subsidiary of EMU Construction, which in turn is owned by Sameer Gehlaut through Mugwort Real EstateLimited. Attention of this Court was drawn to the chart Annexure P64. To show that investment of about Rs.614/- crores in India Best Buy flowing of money to and fro from Myrina Builders Pvt. Ltd.
17. Mugwort Real Estate- It is a company stated to be owned by Sameer Gehlaut and has no work history and resources of finance in the financial statement. The proceeds of mobilised advance have been used to acquire equity shares of Gloxina Infrastructure, EMU Construction and Keysha Mining. Petitioner has averred that all these companies are owned and managed by Sameer Gehlaut.
18. Petitioner has alleged that in July, 2016, the Income Tax Department had carried out massive raids in the premises of Indiabulls and its companies located in Mumbai and Delhi and in the year 2019, directed Indiabulls to pay Rs.3 crores as tax and interest charges on the undisclosed income. Reliance is placed upon news report dated 14.06.2019 published in Business Standard (Annexure P-67). Petitioner alleged that in December, 2018, the Indiabulls had settled a few cases before SEBI and paid Rs.48 lakhs as settlement fees. To submit so, reliance is placed on news report published in Economic Times (Annexure P-68).
19. According to petitioner, in terms of Housing Finance Companies – Corporate Governance (National Housing Bank) Directions, 2016, all housing finance companies shall disclose transparently the loans advanced, to enable the National Housing Board to regulate housing finance system in the country. The petitioner is aggrieved that in terms of aforesaid directions, the Central Government, the Registrar of Companies or the Ministry of Corporate Affairs ought to have filed a complaint and taken action on the violation of Sections 77 and 86 of Companies Act, 2013.
20. Petitioner also alleged that the Central Government should have entrusted the investigation of the questionable details of IBHFL to the SFIO. Also the National Housing Bank under the National Housing Bank Act, 1987 ought to have exercised its power to inspect the reports and to collect information from housing finance companies.
21. Petitioner has further alleged that the National Housing Board ought to have directed for a special audit of the accounts of IBHFL as envisaged in Section 33 of National Housing Bank Act, 1987 and the irregularities should have been pointed out and a complaint under Section 50 of the Act should have been made. Also, SEBI should have taken action under Sections 11, 11A, 11B, 11C and 11D to investigate the affairs of the IBHFL. Hence, the petitioner has prayed that since these authorities have failed to take requisite action against Indiabulls, its subsidiary companies as well as group of companies, to ensure a corruption free society, a time-bund investigation by SIT, comprising expert members, be directed.
22. A prayer is also made to direct the Ministry of Corporate Affairs to conduct a fair investigation through the SFIO into the irregularities committed by Indiabulls and companies. A direction is also sought to Reserve Bank of India, National Housing Bank to investigate the financial affairs of IBHFL and direct a special audit.
23. To rebut the allegations of the petitioner, the Ministry of Corporate of Affairs its interim affidavit dated 22.10.2019 by it has been stated that an inspection under Section 206 (5) of the Companies Act, 2013 has already been directed in respect of three companies Indiabulls Ventures Limited, Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited and Indiabulls Real Estate Limited. In its second Affidavit filed on 28.11.2019, it is stated that inspection was in progress. Vide its third additional Affidavit filed on 05.09.2023, Ministry of Corporate of Affairs has stated that it had ordered inspection under Section 206(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 on 23.07.2018 in respect of three companies i.e., IBVL, IBHFL and IBREL and the report was awaited. However, as per Inspection reports dated 15.11.2019 and 19.11.2019, the loans given by IBHFL to five companies, i.e. DLF, Americorp, Vatika, ADRG, Chordia, which was the subject matter of the present writ petition have been repaid and the loans given to the other entities, i.e. Vatika and Chordia, are reported to be ‘Standard Accounts’ and the remaining issues/violations reported in the Inspection Report were under examination. (PDF-2388) The inspection report in respect of Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited were submitted to the Central Government on 15.11.2019 and 03.02.2022 respectively and based upon these reports the Central Government vide Letter dated 13.12.2019 and 23.05.2022 issued instructions in respect of Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited. Pursuant thereto, Inspection Report and Supplementary Inspection Report in respect of Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited was submitted to the Central Government on 28.01.2020 and 03.03.2022 respectively. Based upon these Inspection reports, the Central Government vide letter dated 20.02.2020 and 25.07.2022 issued directions for further inspection in respect of certain procedural violations of compoundable nature, which had been duly compounded by the companies under inspection and the concerned persons. These inspection reports were shared with SEBI, NHB and State Government of Haryana. Based upon these inspections, the Ministry has ordered inspection of books of accounts of following companies:-
(a) Jasol Investment & Trading (P) Ltd.
(b) Joindre Finance (P) Ltd.
(c) Myrina Real Estate (P) Ltd.
(d) Karabhumi Estate (P) Ltd.
(e) Kritikka Infrastructure (P) Ltd.
(f) Indiabulls Infraestate Ltd.

The Ministry has also directed separate investigation into the affairs of Built to Live Reality LLP.
24. Consequent upon the conclusion of inspection of Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. & other two entities mentioned above wherein compoundable violations under the Companies Act, 2013 were reported, the cases having arisen as an off shoot of the aforesaid inspections, are underway.
25. In the counter-Affidavit filed on behalf of respondent -SEBI, it has been stated that IBHFL is a Housing Finance Company and is primarily indulged in providing loans and advances, which fall under Regulatory purview of National Housing Board and Reserve Bank of India, therefore, the allegations of diversion and misappropriation of funds by issuance of dubious loans by IBHFL or its promoters or its group of companies or its subsidiaries and so, a letter dated 20.08.2019 was sent to National Housing Board stating that SEBI is neither a proper party nor a necessary party to the present proceedings.
26. Respondent-NHB in its Affidavit has stated that it has no regulatory power over any of the companies mentioned in the writ petition as power of NHB stands transferred to RBI w.e.f. 09.08.2019 and, therefore, this respondent has forwarded the complaint in the present petition for necessary action to SEBI, ROC, SFIO and RBI who have the regulatory power. However, it is stated that Ms. Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. (IHFL) was granted certificate of registration by NHB to carry on the business of housing finance institution and is amenable to the provisions of NHB Act and in exercise of its powers conferred under Section 33 of NHB Act, a special audit of IHFL was conducted.
It is further stated that since NHB had the supervisory power to purview the functioning of Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. having granted certificate of registration by NHB, no other company mentioned in the present writ petition could be audited.
In the counter-Affidavit, the NHB has further stated that the audit was conducted by M/s Ravi Ranjan & Co. LLP, (Chartered Accountants) hereinafter referred to as the Auditor.
Respondent-NHB has stated that none of the companies mentioned in the writ petition except Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. were in the regulatory, therefore, the NHB could not get the records/transactions of the said companies verified and a Special Auditor has conducted an audit of the records/transactions of the Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited and submitted its report vide e-mail dated 07.04.2020. As per the Auditor, the investment made in Americorp Group, namely, Jasol Investment & Trading Pvt. Ltd. and Joindre Finance Pvt. Ltd. are as under:-
Details of Investment by Jasol Investment and Trading Company Private Limited (Rs. In Crore)
Name of the Company
Mode
31.03.2016
31.03.2017
31.03.2018
31.03.2019
Indiabulls Real Estate Limited
Equity Shares
72.50
62.27
–
–
Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited
Equity Shares
3.82
22.88
–
–
Indiabulls Venture Limited
Equity Shares
–
19.73
–
–
Myrina Builders Private Limited
OCD
15.00
31.00
31.00
–
Myrina Real Estate Private Limited
OCD
18.00
31.00
31.00
–

Total
109.32
166.89
62.00
–

27. SG Group Company, Myrina Real Estate Private Limited, which was not mentioned in the writ petition, had received investment from Jasol Investment. Besides funds by Jasol Investment in financial years 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17 are from other entities like Prabhudas Liladhar Financial Services Private Limited (secured against equity shares of IBREL, IHFL, Infosys Limited and Edelweiss Financial Services Limited), loan from Kotak Mahindra Investment Limited (secured against equity shares of IBREL & Edelwis Financial Services), loan from JM Financials Product Limited (secured against equity shares of IBREL and Infosys Limited). Further, funds were raised from other AG companies, including Indialand Tech Park Private Limited and Americorp Capital Private Limited.
With regard to investment by Joindre Finance in Indiabulls Group/SG Group companies, the Auditor has furnished the following report:-
Details of Investment by Joindre Finance Private Limited (Rs. In Crore)
Name of the Company
Mode
31.03.2016
31.03.2017
31.03.2018
31.03.2019
Indiabulls Real Estate Limited
Equity Shares
70.38
55.13
–
–
Iphito Real Estate Private Limited
OCD
11.00
44.00
44.00
–
Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited
Equity Shares
3.26
32.07
–
–
Indiabulls Venture Limited
Equity Shares

19.85
–
–
Cleta Infracon Private Limited
OCD
–
–
–
44.00

Total
84.64
151.05
44.00
44.00

28. Reliance ADAG Group Companies – With regard to allegations of the writ petitioner that IHFL had given loans to five Reliance ADAG Companies (ADAG), Reliance Big Entertainment Pvt. Ltd., Reliance Communications Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., Reliance Interactive Advisors Private Limited, Reliance Inceptum Pvt. Ltd & Zapak Digital Entertainment Ltd. and that two ADAG companies, namely, Reliance Capital Ltd. & Reliance Corporate Advisory Pvt. Ltd. had infused funds in SG Group Companies. The Auditor’s observation is that the ADAG Companies had repaid the loans during the review period.
Sr. No.
Borrower’s Name
As on 31st March, 2019 O/s
1
Reliance Big Entertainment Pvt. Ltd.
Nil
** The Ledger accounts of the same could not be extracted as Loans were fully repaid before the beginning of period under review.
2.
Reliance Communications Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

3.
Reliance Interactive Advisors Private Limited **

4.
Reliance Inceptum Pvt. Ltd.

5.
Zapak Digital Entertainment Ltd.

6.
Big Flicks Pvt. Ltd.

7.
Reliance Land Private Limited

29. With regard to investment made by Reliance Corporate Advisory Services Ltd. in SG Group Companies, the report of the Auditor observed that OCDs were issued to Reliance Capital Advisory Services Pvt. Ltd., however, the Auditor could not identify further utilisation of the funds realised through issue of the OCDs in case of Reliance Minerals Pvt. Ltd. and Meru Minerals Pvt. Ltd. The Auditor also reported that Reliance Interactive Advisors Private Limited did not have loan outstanding during the period under review. The Auditor has remarked that the analysis of SG Group Companies is limited to the extent that the same has been based on the year-end outstanding appearing in the AFS of these companies. Hence, they were unable to comment on the dates/timelines of flow of funds/transactions between these companies in the absence of respective ledgers and bank statements during the year.
30. C. Chordia Group:- With regard to the allegations of petitioner that IHFL had given loans to three Chordia Group Companies and two companies out of these companies, namely, Built to Live Realty LLP and Mahalunge Land Developers LLP had diverted the funds. The Auditor’s report observed that apart from these three companies, ten more companies belonging to Chordia Group Companies were provided loans by IHFL and out of these 23 sanctioned loans, loan of twelve accounts was ‘NIL’.
31. AC Realty Spaces LLP: – As per AFS, Loan from NBFC stood at Rs.184.07 crores and Rs.133.40 crores as on 31.03.2019 and 31.03.2018, respectively. As per loan book of IHFL, balance loan outstanding as on 31.03.2019 and 31.03.2018 was Rs. 29.64 Cr and Rs. 133.17 Cr respectively and thereby indicating that the Firm did not disclose the loan taken from IHFL in AFS of FY 2017-18. Further, Charge was not filed with RoC for the loan availed.
32. Built to live Realty LLP:
Loan of Rs. 305 crore sanctioned to Built to Live Realty LLP was disbursed to Classic Hotel Management (India) Private and same is appearing as Long Term Borrowings in the financial statements of later. The audit report suggested that as on 31.03.2018, payments were made to Kumar Urban Pvt Ltd. and Delioitte, however, no payment was traced to Indiabulls Real Estate Limited.
33. D.Vatika Group Companies: With regard to allegations against the Vatika Group Companies, the Auditor has observed that out of the fifty three companies, one company, namely, Aspire Promoters Private Limited was not provided loan during the period under the review.
34. During inspection, the auditor was informed by IHFL that Vatika group was jointly managed by the brothers, namely, Mr. Gaurav Bhalla and Mr. Gautam Bhalla, till 2012, however, in 2012-13 both brothers have entered into a family settlement and businesses have been separated in two groups i.e. Vatika Group, headed by Mr. Gautam Bhalla and Dream Cart Group, headed by Mr. Gaurav Bhalla and therefore companies are not related or belong to same group. However, while verifying the end use of funds from AFS the auditor observed that borrowed fund has been transferred from Dream Cart group companies to Vatika Ltd for purchase of land.
35. One hundred ninety eight loans were advanced by IHFL to fifty two Vatika Group entities as alleged in the petition and out of it, three loans were fully repaid by Vatika Group to IHFL as on 31.03.2019 and some of the loan accounts were nill as on 31.12.2019. Out of fifty two companies, one company, namely, Aspire Promoters Pvt. Ltd. did not have any outstanding. Besides ADPL, i.e. Agnes Developers Private Limited, who had further invested amount in Karkinos Construction Private Limited and India Best Buy Private Limited, the Auditor observed that the loans stood completely paid.
36. DLF Group Companies:- With regard to three companies belonging to DLF Group, namely, Naja Builders and Developers Private Limited, Cotys Buildcon Private Limited and Malayeka Builders and Developers Private Limited had advanced loans to fifty two DLF Group of Companies as on 31.12.2019 and there was outstanding balance of 0.03 crores in case of DLF Home Developers Ltd. and rest of the loans granted to the other companies were fully repaid.
37. The Auditor has thereby observed as under:-
“Auditor’s Observation:
The Auditor has observed certain instances of non-compliances/violations by IHFL of the provisions of NHB Act and the Guidelines, Directions, Policy Circulars etc. issued by NHB. A copy of the Special Auditor’s report dated 07.04.2020. A show cause dated 09.07.2020 for the contraventions observed in special audit has been issued and IHFL has submitted its reply to the said show cause and the same is under process.
In addition to the above, NHB has issued show cause with respect to the contraventions/non-compliances observed during the regulatory inspection as on 31.03.2019 and after examining the reply submitted by IHFL, NHB has already imposed penalties to the tune of Rs.3,45,000/- for various non-compliances.
5. Further, with regard to the transactions between above mentioned SG Group and the alleged companies and vice versa; NHB is sharing the audit report with MCA, RBI & SEBI, for necessary action, as these companies do not falls under the supervisory purview of the National Housing Bank.”

38. In the counter Affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent-RBI, it is averred that prior to the amendment of the National Housing Bank Act, 1987 (NHB Act) by Finance Act (2) of 2019 ( Act 23 of 2019), the powers of National Housing Bank (NHB) established under NHB Act, in relation to companies which are housing finance institutions, were similar to the powers conferred on Reserve Bank of India under Chapter III B of the RBI Act. Therefore, the Reserve Bank in exercise of its powers under Section 45 NC of the Reserve Bank of India Act, by notification dated 15.11.1997 had exempted housing finance institutions from the provisions of Chapter III B of the Reserve Bank of India Act. The Finance Act (2) of 2019 (Act 23 of 2019) has since amended the National Housing Bank Act, 1987 specifically conferring certain powers on the Reserve Bank of India in respect of housing finance institutions and these provisions of the Finance Act amending the NHB Act has come into force with effect from 09.08.2019. Further, the Reserve Bank has since issued Notification dated 09.08.2019 in exercise of its powers under section 45 NC of the RBI Act rescinding its earlier notification exempting housing finance institutions from the provisions of Chapter IIIB of the RBI Act except section 45-IA of that Act. Therefore, consequent to the amendment of the NHB Act and the notification dated issued by the Reserve Bank of India, the Reserve Bank has the powers to regulate and supervise housing finance companies as provided in the NHB Act as well as in Chapter IIIB (except section 45 -lA) of the RBI Act.
39. The respondent-RBI has further averred that some of the companies mentioned in the petition, namely, Americorp Capital, Jasol Investment & Trading, Joindre Finance Pvt Ltd., Reliance Capital Limited etc. are Non Banking Financial Companies (NBFC) as per under Section 450 IA of the RBI Act, however, RBI has no information on the companies mentioned in the petition which are not NBFC nor housing finance institutions. The RBI had also conducted a scrutiny of three Americorp group of companies, namely, Jasol Investment & Trading Company Pvt. Ltd., Joindre Finance Pvt. Ltd. and Americorp Capital Pvt. Ltd., from 08.01.2020 to 10.01.2020 with regard to IBHFL had extending loans, which have been ploughed back to Indiabulls group companies through Equity investment, and it was found that IBHFL had actually lent Rs.39 crore to Americorp Capital Pvt. Ltd. on 30.03.2016 “as per usage defined in AOA/MOA and/or General Corporate Purpose” at variable interest rate, which was calculated at 14% per annum (at the time of sanction), and on the same day, the amount was further lent by Americorp Capital Pvt. Ltd. to other Americorp group companies. The loan availed by Americorp Capital from IBHFL was repaid on 01.09.2016.
40. The RBI has further averred that five Reliance ADA Group companies, which were not NBFCs, had obtained loans worth Rs.1568 Crore from IBHFL, which was later repaid, details whereof are as under:-

S. No.
Reliance ADA Group Borrower Entity
Amount
Agreement Date
Repayment Date
1.
Reliance Inceptum Private Limited
106
26.11.2016
16.01.2019
2.
Zapak Digital Entertainment Limited
156
28.12.2016
25.09.2017
3.
Reliance Big Entertainment Pvt. Ltd.
210
24.09.2015
23.11.2017
4.
RCom Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.
200
28.11.2016
14.06.2018
5.
Reliance Interactive Advisors Pvt. Ltd.
300
30.11.2014
31.03.2015
6.
Reliance Interactive Advisors Pvt. Ltd.
300
27.02.2015
30.09.2015
7.
Reliance Interactive Advisors Pvt. Ltd.
296
22.09.2015
29.12.2016

Total
1568

41. In the light of afore-noted arguments advanced by learned counsel representing both the sides, this Court has gone through the material placed on record.
42. The petitioner in the present petition has alleged that the modus adopted by the group of companies owned by Indiabulls of investing money back to the Indiabulls promoter companies is in three ways, which has been noted herein above, however reiterated for the sake of convenience:-
a. By investing in Preference Shares of IB group subsidiaries.
b. By investing Compulsory Convertible Debentures. These debentures have been issued to the investing companies at a rate of interest of 0.01%.
c. By receipt of Mobilization Advance paid to a contractor for mobilization of resources for a project.

43. In the preceding paragraphs of this judgment, this Court has noted the claims of petitioner in respect of amounts allegedly siphoned away by the Indiabulls of companies, which have been advanced as loan by IBHFL to its own group of companies. The nutshell whereof is that:-
“i. Four Americorp Group companies received about Rs. 151 crores from IBHFL, which is invested back in four Indiabulls Group companies, including IBHFL.
ii. Out of a total loan of Rs. 1580 crore that five Reliance ADAG companies received from IBHFL in loans, Rs. 570 crores was invested back in nine Indiabulls subsidiaries through debentures
iii. Three Chordia Group companies received Rs. 1209.50 crores from IBHFL in loans. This loan was squared up through money diverted from Mahalunge Land Developers (group Company of Chordia) from the amount borrowed from IBHFL. In addition Rs.50 crores was paid as professional fee to Indiabulls Real Estate Limited.
iv. IBHFL loaned about Rs. 4600 crore to 51 companies of Vatika Group, many of which were pass-through companies, with a paid-up capital of barely Rs. 1 lakh. Agnes Developers, one of the Vatika Group companies, ploughed back Rs. 400 crores in Karkinos Constructions and India Best Buy in 2014-15 in the form of debentures.
V. Similarly, IBHFL has put in more than Rs. 1705 crore in 48 companies of DLF Group, many of which have negative worth.”

44. For alleging the afore-noted siphoning of funds by the IBHFL and other Indiabull group of companies, the petitioner has relied upon news report dated 14.06.2019 published in Business Standard and news report published in December, 2018 in Economic Times, to submit that in July, 2016, the Income Tax Department had carried out massive raids in the premises of Indiabulls and its companies located in Mumbai and Delhi and directed Indiabulls to pay Rs.3 crores as tax and interest charges on the undisclosed income in the year 2019. Petitioner has alleged that in December, 2018, the Indiabulls had settled a few cases before SEBI and paid Rs.48 lakhs as settlement fees.
45. It is relevant to note here that the Business Standard in respect of its article published on 15.10.2019, has acceded that the contents of the Article were erroneous. Vide letter dated 18.10.2019 written to the Advocate of respondent, it sought to clarify stating as under:-
“Dated: October 18, 2019
To,

Mr. Rishi Agarwala
Agarwal Law Associates
Advocates Supreme Court
19, Babar Road, Bengali Market, New Delhi-110001

Also At:
Chamber 48, Lawyers Chamber
Supreme Court of India
New Delhi – 110001

Subject : Your legal notice dated October 09, 2019 in respect of article published and appeared on our website titled “Indiabulls – LVB merger hinges on a dozen NOCs – Pending investigations delay Reserve Bank nod” and our reply dated October 11, 2019

Dear Sir,

1. Please note we discussed the captioned matter with your client namely Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited to explore settlement.
2. It may be noted that it was inadvertent on our part. Further, as discussed and agreed during our meeting, the matter stands settled between your client and us.
3. Under these circumstances we request you to kindly withdraw the said notice dated October 09, 2019.

Yours sincerely,
For Business Standard Private Limited”

46. The above-referred shows that pursuant to legal notice issued by the respondent- Indiabulls, the Business Standard has acknowledged that the information given by them was inadvertent and without any premise. The Business Standard has offered settlement for making false allegations against the respondent-Indiabulls.
47. The categoric stand of respondent-Ministry of Corporate Affairs is that inspection under Section 206(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 in respect of three companies i.e. IBVL, IBHFL and IBREL was directed on 23.07.2018 and as per Inspection reports dated 15.11.2019 and 19.11.2019, the loans given by IBHFL to five companies, i.e. DLF, Americorp, Vatika, ADRG, Chordia, which is the subject matter of the present writ petition, have been repaid and the loans given to the other entities, i.e. Vatika and Chordia, are reported to be ‘Standard Accounts’ and the remaining issues/violations reported in the Inspection Report were under examination. The final inspection reports in respect of Indiabulls were submitted to the Central Government on 15.11.2019 and 03.02.2022 and in respect of Indiabulls Real Estate limited, reports were submitted to the Central Government on 28.01.2020 and 03.03.2022. These reports were also shared with SEBI, NHB and State Government of Haryana.
48. The respondent-SEBI has in crystal clear words taken the stand that the loans advanced by the Indiabulls or its subsidiaries or group of companies fall under the purview of National Housing Board and Reserve Bank of India. In turn, the respondent National Housing Board (NHB) in its Affidavit has stated that even though its powers stand transferred to RBI w.e.f. 09.08.2019, however, since it had granted certificate of registration to the Indiabulls to carry on the business of housing finance institution, in its powers under Section 33 of the NHB Act, a special audit of IHFL only was conducted by M/s Ravi Ranjan & Co. LLP, (Chartered Accountants), and not other companies mentioned in the writ petition.
49. The Auditor of NHB has in its report stated that Myrina Real Estate Private Limited, had received funds from Prabhudas Liladhar Financial Services Private Limited (secured against equity shares of IBREL, IHFL, Infosys Limited and Edelweiss Financial Services Limited), Kotak Mahindra Investment Limited (secured against equity shares of IBREL & Edelwis Financial Services), JM Financials Product Limited (secured against equity shares of IBREL and Infosys Limited and other AG companies, including Indialand Tech Park Private Limited