HIRANAND KISHINCHAND GANGWANI vs OYO APARTMENT INVESTMENT LLP

$~37

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 685/2024 and IA 38478/2024
HIRANAND KISHINCHAND GANGWANI …..Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rishi Bhatnagar and Mr. Rishabh Gaur, Adv.

versus

OYO APARTMENT INVESTMENT LLP …..Respondent
Through: Mr. Harsh Prakash, Adv.

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR

O R D E R (ORAL)
% 05.09.2024

1. This is a petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 19961 for extension of the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal, which was in seisin of the dispute between the parties.

2. The mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal is stated to have expired on 16 August 2024.

3. Learned Counsel for the respondent has no objection.

4. Accordingly, the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal stands extended by a period of six months from today.

5. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
SEPTEMBER 5, 2024/yg
Click here to check corrigendum, if any

1 “the 1996 Act”, hereinafter
—————

————————————————————

—————

————————————————————

OMP(MISC)(COMM) 685/2024 Page 1 of 1