TATA PROJECTS LIMITED vs OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED

$~54
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 659/2024, I.A. 38079/2024

TATA PROJECTS LIMITED …..Petitioner
Through: Ms. Sushma Nagraj, Ms. Renu Gupta, Ms. Vibhuti Keny, Ms. Pratiksha Jalan, and Ms. Carina Arora, Advs.

versus

OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
LIMITED …..Respondent
Through: Mr. Sandeep Kumar Mahapatra and Mr. Tribhuvan, Advs.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R (ORAL)
% 02.09.2024

I.A. 38079/2024 (for exemption)

1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 659/2024

3. This is a petition under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961 for extension of the mandate of the arbitrator in seisin of the dispute between the parties which, the Court has been informed, has reserved the award in the matter.

4. It is stated that the mandate of the learned arbitrator have expired on 31 August 2024.

5. The learned Counsel for the respondent has no objection.

6. Accordingly, the mandate of the learned arbitrator stands extended by three months from 31 August 2024.

7. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

C.HARI SHANKAR, J
SEPTEMBER 02, 2024/aky

Click here to check corrigendum, if any
1 “the 1996 Act”, hereinafter
—————

————————————————————

—————

————————————————————

OMP(MISC.)(COMM.) 659/2024 Page 1 of 2