KAMAL KUMAR ( PRORIETOR AASTHA ELECTRICALS) vs ENERGY EFFICIENCY SERVICES LIMITED

$~4
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ARB.P. 405/2024
KAMAL KUMAR (PRORIETOR AASTHA ELECTRICALS)
…..Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rohit Saraswat, Mr Sharan Mehta, Mr. Karan Sharma, Mr. Gaurav Anand, Advs. with petitioner in person

versus

ENERGY EFFICIENCY SERVICES LIMITED ….Respondent
Through:

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R (O R A L)
% 11.07.2024

1. This is a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the 1996 Act), for reference of the dispute between the parties to arbitration.

2. Learned Counsel for the respondent has no objection.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that similar disputes between the parties is presently being arbitrated upon by Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.K. Pathak, a learned retired Judge of this Court under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC).

4. Learned counsel ad idem submit that this dispute may also be referred to Justice Pathak to be adjudicated under the aegis of the DIAC.

5. Accordingly, the dispute in this petition stands referred for arbitration to Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.K. Pathak (retired) to be adjudicated under the aegis of the DIAC.

6. The learned Arbitrator would be entitled to charge fees in accordance with the schedule of fees fixed by the DIAC and the arbitration would proceed in accordance with the rules, regulations and procedure of DIAC.

7. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
JULY 11, 2024
dsn
Click here to check corrigendum, if any

ARB. P. 405/2024 Page 1 of 3