Wednesday, July 2, 2025
Latest:
delhihighcourt

M/S BRIJBIHARI CONCAST PVT. LTD. (THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SH. RAJEEV AGARWAL) vs DIRECTOR GENERAL DIRECTORTAE GENERAL OF GOODS AND SERVICES TAX INTELLIGENCE MEERURT ZONAL UNIT (THROUGH ITS ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL) & ANR.

Information

$~37
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Judgment delivered on: 14.03.2024

+ W.P.(C) 3832/2024 & CM. APPLS. 15717-18/2024

M/S BRIJBIHARI CONCAST PVT. LTD. (THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SH. RAJEEV AGARWAL) ….. Petitioner

Versus
DIRECTOR GENERAL DIRECTORTAE GENERAL OF GOODS AND SERVICES TAX INTELLIGENCE MEERURT ZONAL UNIT (THROUGH ITS ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL) & ANR
….. Respondents

Advocates who appeared in this case:

For the Petitioner: Mr. R.P. Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms. Suhani Mathur, Advocate.
,,
CORAM:-
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA

JUDGMENT

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1. Petitioner impugns order dated 18.12.2023, whereby the bank account of the petitioner has been provisionally attached under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.
2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has objected to the said provisional attachment and filed a representation dated 19.01.2024, which was dispatched on 03.02.2024. He submits that despite service of the same, it has not yet been disposed of.
3. Issue Notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for respondents. With the consent of parties, the petition is taken up for final disposal.
4. Learned counsel for respondents submits that objections are pending consideration before the Competent Authority and assures that the same shall be disposed of within a period of two weeks from today. Assurance is accepted.
5. In view of the above, petition is disposed of, directing the Competent Authority to decide the objections filed by the petitioner to the provisional attachment within a period of two weeks from today. An opportunity of personal hearing shall also be granted to the petitioner while disposing of objections. Needless to say, it would be open to the petitioner to avail of such further remedies as may be permissible in law in case petitioner is aggrieved by any further order passed.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
MARCH 14, 2024/NA

W.P.(C) 3832/2024 Page 2 of 2