ARUN SRIVASTAV vs JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY AND ORS

$~40
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 3934/2023
ARUN SRIVASTAV ….. Petitioner
Through: Mr. Krishnan Mishra, Mr. Param Kumar Mishra, Mr. Jagjeet Kumar Bhatt and Ms. Prashanshika Takur, Advs

versus

JAWAHARLAL NEHRU
UNIVERSITY AND ORS ….. Respondents
Through: Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr. Subhrodeep Saha, Advocates, for JNU
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
ORDER (ORAL)
% 07.05.2024

CM APPL. 21696/2024 (Addl. documents)

1. This is an application by the JNU to place certain additional documents on record. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has no objection. The documents are taken on record.

2. The application is allowed accordingly.

W.P.(C) 3934/2023

3. Mr. Krishnam Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that his client has now secured admission to the Ph.D. course in the next year on being selected thereto on merits.

4. However, he submits that the writ petition would nonetheless survive insofar as he seeks compensation from the JNU for having made the petitioner lose a year.

5. Mr. Saha, learned Counsel for the JNU points out that there is no prayer for compensation in the writ petition. This is found to be correct.

6. In that view of the matter, the grievance in this writ petition does not survive for consideration.

7. The writ petition is disposed of.

CM APPL. 15349/2023 (stay)

8. This application does not survive for consideration and is disposed of.

C.HARI SHANKAR, J
MAY 7, 2024
rb
Click here to check corrigendum, if any

W.P.(C) 3934/2023 Page 1 of 2