delhihighcourt

KIRPAL SINGH & ORS.  Vs STATE & ANR.

CRL.M.C. 1415/2020 Page 1 of 3
$~7
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 13.01.2021
+ CRL.M.C. 1415/2020 & CRL.M.A. 5435/2020
KIRPAL SINGH & ORS. ….. Petiti oners
Through: Mr. Dileep Poolakkat, Advocate

Versus

STATE & ANR. ….. Respondents
Through Mr. Panna Lal Sharma,
Additional Public Prosecutor for
respondent No.1/State with SI
Govind Singh, police station
Uttam Nagar
Mr. Manpreet Singh, respondent
No.2/complainant

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
The hearing has been conducted through video confe rencing.
1. Vide this petition, quashing of FIR No. 206/2010, u nder
Sections 452/323/34 IPC, registered at police stati on Uttam Nagar,
Delhi is sought by petitioners.
2. Notice issued.
3. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, learned Additional Public Pro secutor for
respondent No.1/State accepts notice and submits th at respondent No.2
2021:DHC:138 CRL.M.C. 1415/2020 Page 2 of 3
is present through video conference and he has been identified as the
complainant of FIR in question by the Investigating Officer of this
case, who is also present through video conferencin g.
4. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties , the present
petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal .
5. Petitioners and respondent No.2/complainant are nei ghbours.
On 23-06-2010 at around 10:45 p.m. an altercation t ook place between
the parties, which culminated into registration of FIR in question by
respondent No.2.
6. The present petition has been filed on the ground t hat with the
intervention of common friends and well wishers, th e dispute between
the parties has been resolved in terms of Settlemen t Deed dated 23-12-
2019.
7. Respondent No.2 is present through video conferenci ng and he
has affirmed the factum of settlement with petition ers in terms of
Settlement Deed dated 23-12-2019 and he also submit s that he does
not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
8. Keeping in view that the dispute between the partie s has been
amicably resolved, this Court is inclined to quash the FIR in question,
2021:DHC:138 CRL.M.C. 1415/2020 Page 3 of 3
as no useful purpose would be served in continuing with the
proceedings arising out of the present FIR.
9. For the reasons afore-noted, FIR No. 206/2010, unde r Sections
452/323/34 IPC, registered at police station Uttam Nagar, Delhi and
consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quas hed.
10. The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.
11. Pending application also stands disposed of.
12. The order be uploaded on the website of this Court forthwith.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)
JUDGE
JANUARY 13, 2021
r

2021:DHC:138