delhihighcourt

SYED FAHMI ALI  Vs SPORTINA PAYCE INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. -Judgment by Delhi High Court

$~56
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Judgment delivered on: 11.01.2023

+ EX.F.A. 4/2023
SYED FAHMI ALI ….. Petitioner
Versus

SPORTINA PAYCE INFRASTRUTURE PVT. LTD ….. Respondent
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner : Adv. (Appearance not given)

For the Respondent : None

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

JUDGMENT

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. (ORAL)
[ The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid mode ]
CM APPL. 1251/2023-EXEMP.
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application stands disposed of.

CM APPL. 1253/2023 (DELAY 11 DAYS IN FILING APPEAL)

3. This is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal.
4. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The delay of 11 days in filing the present appeal is condoned.
5. The application is disposed of.
EX.F.A. 4/2023 & CM APPL. 1252/2023 (STAY)
6. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that subsequent to the passing of the impugned order, this court in another petition has released an amount of Rs. 2 Crore in favour of the respondent.
7. In view of the above, learned counsel seeks liberty to approach the Executing Court with an appropriate application in respect of the submission that the respondent has already received an amount of Rs.2 Crore from this court in a different proceedings.
8. In view of the above submissions, the liberty sought is granted without prejudice to the rights & contentions of the appellant.
9. The appeal is disposed of in accordance with the aforesaid directions.

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
(JUDGE)
JANUARY 11, 2023
neelam

Neutral Citation Number 2023/DHC/000251

EX.F.A. 4/2023 2